a founder of the codex

Apophenia

Simulacrifex nebularis·the Cloud-Face Weaver

From Latin simulacrum, an image or likeness, -fex, maker, and nebula, cloud; the maker of figures out of clouds.

Level
Conceptorganism
Book
Semaphorathe bestiary of display
Phylum
Linkimage schema
Class
Outputits display
Niche
Parasitethe mechanism of a host idea
Mode
Habithow it keeps existing
Stage
Matureindividuated
Status
Living
Habitat
Dream

Its kinds · Roget, 1852: Formation of Ideas · Wilkins, 1668: Natural Power · WordNet, 1990: Cognition · Llull, 1308: F · Imaginative

Cloud-Face Weaver, the whole specimen
Plate II. Simulacrifex nebularis, the whole specimen.

A mind tuned to find patterns finds them in noise too, and the meaning it feels is the same whether the pattern is there or not.

Every pattern is seen before it is proven.

behavior Gathers scattered specks into faces as it moves, and the faces fade when it stops looking.

provocation

Which pattern in your life have you never checked against chance?

Each draw is the being derived afresh by the current laws at another seed (laws §11); the chosen one leads (where they sit in the morphospace).

I Dissection

Each organ answers one question about the idea. The framed one, its output, is the dominant organ: the being's class, the one the idea could not lose and stay itself.

Kernel of Apophenia

Fig. 1. Kernel

False alarm

Which premise, if it were false, would kill this idea?

A mind tuned to find patterns will also find them where there are none, and the finding comes with a feeling that it means something.2

drawn as: glyph · view: cross section

Boundary of Apophenia

Fig. 2. Boundary

Illusory contour

What sets it apart from what it is not, and how does it keep that distinction?

It is set apart from discovery only by whether the pattern holds when the data change; the felt certainty is the same in both.3

drawn as: margin · view: microscope

Intake of Apophenia

Fig. 3. Intake

Inkblot

What must it feed on to work? What has to be present, noticed or supplied?

It feeds on noise, stains on a wall, clouds, static, coincidences, any field rich enough to hold a face.1

drawn as: ocellus · view: transparent

Mechanism of Apophenia

Fig. 4. Mechanism

Constellation

How does it turn what it takes in into what it gives out?

Fragments are joined to fragments by a likeness, and each joining makes the next more likely, until a figure stands out of chance.3

drawn as: chromatophore · view: pinned

Output of Apophenia

Fig. 5. Output

Omen

❦ dominant organ

What does it make possible, visible or knowable?

It gives invention and paranoia alike, the faces Leonardo saw in stains, the conspiracy, the omen.1, 4

drawn as: display · view: detached

Dispersal of Apophenia

Fig. 6. Dispersal

Moon rabbit

What part of it travels into other minds, ideas and fields, and by what vector?

It travels by being shown; once someone points to the face in the cloud, everyone sees it.4

drawn as: ink · view: series

Decay of Apophenia

Fig. 7. Decay

Hot hand

What can it not digest, where does it fail, and what does it leave behind for others?

It cannot digest chance itself; shown a run of coin tosses it sees a hand behind them, and it leaves behind connections that cannot be unseen.2

drawn as: palimpsest · view: pressed

II Meaning associations

gives tofeeds · intake → intakeGeomancyOracle Stone

descent membership food web resemblance or friction

Lineage

A founder, dissected by hand.

Food web

  • homology its kernel resembles the kernel of Geomancy
    Both make a figure out of chance. Apophenia finds one where there is none; Geomancy builds one on purpose, out of marks made without counting.
  • feeds its intake → the intake of Geomancy
    They eat the same food, noise and random marks. Two beings on one food compete rather than feed each other.
  • friction its boundary rubs against the boundary of Geomancy
    Apophenia is told from discovery only by whether the pattern holds; Geomancy is told from chance by its fixed alphabet of sixteen figures. One has no rule, the other is nothing but rule.

Kin

same kind in Roget Dream, Faith, Memory, Placebo, Presence, Prophecy, Knowing Trust, Afterlistening, Commemorative Revision, Simultaneous Remembering, Hesychology, Subtractive Phenomenology

same kind in Wilkins Dream, Memory, Presence, Afterlistening, Simultaneous Remembering

same kind in WordNet Dream, Faith, Memory, Qualia, Silence, Volition, Afterlistening, Simultaneous Remembering, Hesychology, Subtractive Phenomenology

same kind in Llull Dream, Mimesis, Symmetry, Afterlistening, Poetry

same phylum Entanglement, Mimesis, Resonance (Automata), Symbol, Shared Breath, Witnessed Relief, Witnessed Relief (Mycelia)

same dominant organ Chiaroscuro, Echolalia, Emergence, Erosion, Mimesis, Nostalgia, Placebo, Rain, Babelhum, Afterlistening, The Festival Calendar

Genome

  • pattern
  • noise
  • meaning also in Placebo
  • coincidence
  • conviction

III In the world

Echoes

  • a face in the clouds
  • Leonardo's stained wall
  • a board of pins and string
  • an omen

IV Record

How it was drawn

its draw 3, a point in the morphospace (laws §8), drawn by flux-2-klein-4b.safetensors.

axisvalue
booksemaphora
symmetryasymmetric
organizationsegmented
silhouettebell
scalemicroscopic
proportionsheared latent
growthaccretion
articulationjointed latent
opennesssolid latent
skeletonendoskeleton latent
locomotiongliding latent
patternreticulate
colorationnuptial latent
substancewire tissue
surfacemottled
paletteverdigris
luminositysheen
transparencyopaque latent
gesturegathers
unitycomposite latent
modalitycontingent
causationformal latent
determinacydoubled
fusionseam
anomalyinverted
graftstitches
techniquegouache
viewpointprofile
valuehigh key latent
balancegrounded latent
densityintricate latent
rhythmclustered latent
saturationmuted latent
appendagesocelli, cilia
anchor (body)a bowerbird's bower, an avenue of sticks decorated with collected bright objects
anchor (detail)a dew drop holding a tiny inverted image of the world

Sources

  1. Leonardo da Vinci, Treatise on Painting (compiled c. 1540), on seeing figures in stained walls
  2. Klaus Conrad, Die beginnende Schizophrenie (1958)
  3. Peter Brugger, From Haunted Brain to Haunted Science (2001)
  4. Michael Shermer, Patternicity (Scientific American, 2008)

❦